Emissions

Carbon isn't close.

Money is arguable. Stress is my judgment. Carbon is arithmetic: how much fuel a plane burns per seat, and how dirty the electricity is where you plug the car in. It sits next to the verdict and never decides it — sometimes this site tells you to fly anyway.

Flying

11 kg per passenger for taxi, takeoff and climb, plus 0.2 kg per passenger-mile under 600 miles, 0.15 kg up to 2,300, and 0.14 kg beyond that. Short hops are worse per mile because climbing is where the fuel goes.

The total is then multiplied by 1.9. Contrails and high-altitude nitrogen oxides roughly double a flight's warming effect; the accepted range is 1.7 to 2.0. Take that multiplier out and flying still loses most trips, just by less.

Driving

Miles divided by 3.7 miles per kWh, times 1.1 because roughly a tenth of the energy never reaches the wheels, times the carbon intensity of the grid where the trip starts.

That figure is for the whole car. Four people in it means a quarter each — which is the part a flight can't match, since every extra passenger is another seat burning fuel.

Try it with your grid

TripDrivingFlyingDifferenceOn the dirtiest grid
200 miles0.8 kg171 kg221× worse to fly49 kg driving
500 miles1.9 kg376 kg195× worse to fly123 kg driving
800 miles3.1 kg441 kg143× worse to fly197 kg driving
1,400 miles5.4 kg754 kg139× worse to fly345 kg driving

The last column is West Virginia, the dirtiest grid on the continent at 830 g/kWh. Even there, 2 people in the car comes out ahead of the same seats on a plane at these distances. The US average is 370 g/kWh.

What this leaves out

If you don't own an electric car

A petrol car at 30 mpg puts out roughly 0.3 kg per mile — about 150 kg on a 500-mile trip, close to what one seat on that flight costs once contrails are counted. Split between two people it's still better than flying; alone it's roughly a draw. This site is about the electric case, and that's the honest comparison for everyone else.